As these pages print it.

From father to son to grandson

The history page tells the sequence in prose, and the sidebar tells it in three captions. The prose has a surname once, a personal name once, and a grandson at the end. The captions are Alfredo I, Alfredo II, and Alfredo III, with alts that do not all use the numerals.

The page calls the result a dynasty. The sentence that says so is grammatically unfinished, and the note leaves it unfinished.

Alfredo Di Lelio, once

The first sentence gives the surname: Alfredo Di Lelio, just a boy , with the space before the comma. After that, the page mostly says Alfredo. It does not write Di Lelio again in the 1950 sentence, and it does not attach Di Lelio to Armando or to Alfredo III.

The boy had a desire to work and a passion for cooking, and a small family restaurant. The wife is Ines. The year of the firstborn is 1908. Those facts sit in the 1908 note. This note starts from the same man and follows the names that come after the birth.

The page never prints a birth year for Alfredo Di Lelio himself. It says just a boy. It does not say when he retired except by pointing at the war, which is also undated, and at the decision to leave the restaurant to Armando.

Alfredo I appears as a label later, in the 1950 sentence and under the first portrait. The opening sentence does not call him Alfredo I. It calls him Alfredo Di Lelio. The note does not merge the two into a single caption the page never prints.

Armando, as Alfredo II

After the war, the page says Alfredo retired, leaving the worthy heir to his successor, Armando, as Alfredo II, in the restaurant in Via della Scrofa. Armando is the only given name in that role. He is not given a surname. as Alfredo II is how the numeral is attached.

The second portrait's caption is Alfredo II, without Armando. The alt is Alfredo secondo. A reader sees the name in the paragraph and the numeral under the photograph. The page does not print Armando under the photograph.

The next sentences give him the smile and the mustache Umberto, and say this character will be known not as the King, but as the Emperor of Fettuccine. The character in that passage follows Armando. The moustache note quotes those lines. They are not a third biography. They are still the second Alfredo, in the page's order.

He welcomes guests, in the present tense, alongside the experience gained beside his father. The father is not renamed in that sentence. The street is still Via della Scrofa, still without a number, as the street note sets out.

The 1950 hand-over

In 1950 Alfredo I decided to hand the reins and opening a new restaurant in Piazza Augusto Imperatore, 30. The sentence then says the tradition continued by his son Armando, who came away from the local in Via della Scrofa, and then by his son Alfredo III.

his son Armando and his son Alfredo III are both his son in that sentence. The page does not stop to say that one his is Alfredo I and the next his is Armando. The following sentence is the one that sorts the generations: From father to son, from son to grandson.

so it was that of Alfredo became a true dynasty. that of Alfredo is the wording. The page does not write the house of Alfredo or the family of Alfredo. It writes that of Alfredo became a true dynasty. A true dynasty is the claim. The grammar before it stays as printed.

The new restaurant is the square, number 30. The old local is Via della Scrofa. The year is 1950. No other year is added for Alfredo III's start. The sentence does not say he was born then.

Alfredo III, the grandson's sentence

Alfredo III, in fact, inheriting the inspiration of his grandfather and father, has the merit of continued worthily the path traced by his predecessors, taking the name of this historic restaurant in the world.

grandfather and father are both named as roles, not with Di Lelio and Armando repeated. of continued worthily is the phrase. predecessors is plural. historic restaurant in the world does not add a second branch or a city besides the square already named.

The splash captions a portrait Alfredo III°, with the degree sign, and the alt Alfredo, l'imperatore delle fettuccine. The history caption is Alfredo III without the degree sign, alt Alfredo terzo. The portrait note keeps those strings apart. This note uses the body sentence, which says Alfredo III with a full stop and no degree sign.

taking the name does not mean the page prints a new surname. The name he takes, in the sentence, is the name of the restaurant. The restaurant's title on the history page is Il vero Alfredo all'Augusteo. The full stop follows III.

What the dynasty sentence does not list

The page does not give a fourth generation. No caption under the portraits adds a year. The visible captions carry no date. It stops at the grandson. It does not name a wife for Armando or for Alfredo III. Ines remains the only woman named, and she is in the 1908 sentences.

It does not say the three portraits were taken in particular years. The files are ALFREDO-Primo.jpg, ALFREDO-Secondo.jpg, and Alfredo-terzo.jpg. The captions are the numerals and, for the third, Alfredo III. No dates are printed under them.

From father to son, from son to grandson is the whole genealogical formula. It does not add brother, cousin, or a second restaurant still open in Via della Scrofa. The 1950 sentence is where the page says the family came away from that local.

The English page's creative man is not given a generation. The splash's Alfredo Himself is not given one either. The dynasty wording is a history-page sentence, and it is the sentence this note is for.

Questions

What is Armando's surname on the page?

The page does not print one. He is Armando, as Alfredo II. Di Lelio appears with Alfredo at the start, and not with Armando.

How does the page finish the generations?

From father to son, from son to grandson, so it was that of Alfredo became a true dynasty. The next sentence is Alfredo III and his grandfather and father.

Does Alfredo III° appear in the dynasty sentence?

No. The body says Alfredo III. The degree sign is the splash caption, not this sentence.